futuro organizacional

La estandarización de protocolos busca la robotización del ser humano. Pretende evitar que los empleados tengan criterio propio, que piensen. En un mundo de competidores ágiles es insuficiente una visión de control que busque prioritariamente mantener comportamientos.

Si el personal hiciera siempre lo que es mejor para una organización, no se necesitaría el control. Pero algunos individuos no saben lo que se espera de ellos, otros son incapaces de actuar en el mejor interés de la empresa y hay los que no quieren realizar las acciones que les han encomendado.

Los directores de empresa usan mecanismos de control como presupuestos, sistemas de incentivos o tableros de control para que su personal haga lo que debe de hacer, que las cosas sigan el rumbo planeado y así evitar sorpresas desagradables. En otras palabras, las herramientas de control directivo se diseñan para motivar las acciones deseadas y para restringir los comportamientos indeseables.

Uno de los mecanismos más usados es el control de acción. Es decir, medios para asegurar que los individuos desempeñen ciertas acciones, como manuales de procedimientos o supervisión. Asimismo, el control de acción pretende que sean poco probables comportamientos que puedan dañar a la organización. Estas restricciones incluyen medidas físicas, tales como candados, contraseñas para identificar al personal; restricciones administrativas, como separaciones de funciones; vigilancia por medio de cámaras; o revisión pre-operativa, por ejemplo, a través de reuniones formales de planeación y autorización de gasto.

Cuando está bien implementado, el control de acción ofrece el mayor rigor de control. Pero puede tener efectos colaterales como retrasos operativos o causar comportamientos rígidos o burocráticos. Llevado al extremo, el control de las acciones pretendería que las personas tengan una actitud previsible. Harold Green, quien fuera CEO de ITT Industries, diseñaba procedimientos para que su gente fuera tan predecible como los recursos materiales que ellos mismos usaban. Henry Ford se lamentaba que cuando lo único que deseaba contratar era un par de manos, desafortunadamente llegaba con un cerebro pegado.

Por motivos de trabajo, viajo mucho y eso me ha llevado a una categoría en una línea aérea que me permite tener acceso a salones exclusivos en los aeropuertos. Frecuento tanto los salones de algunas ciudades que las personas que trabajan ahí me tratan con familiaridad.

En una ocasión, tenía la urgencia de mandar un correo electrónico. En cuanto aterricé fui directo al salón para usar el Internet. Me negaron la entrada. La persona que atendía me explicó que el salón está diseñado para que lo usen los que van a viajar, no los que acaban de aterrizar.

—Lo entiendo –le dije con amabilidad–, pero tengo una urgencia. Déjame entrar 10 minutos para enviar un correo electrónico.

—El manual nos lo prohíbe –me respondió el empleado de la línea aérea–.

—Revisa mi membresía, puedes darte cuenta de que soy un cliente frecuente. Además, estuve aquí en la mañana y tu compañera me vio (ella asentía). Hace dos días, me atendiste tú y tuvimos una breve conversación.

—Lo recuerdo bien señor Casanueva, pero le repito que el manual nos impide dejarlo entrar.

—Te lo pido como un favor especial. Sólo para mandar un mail.

De nada sirvió que se lo solicitara por su “madrecita” o que amenazara con cambiarme de aerolínea… Sus jefes habían sido tan escrupulosos en restringir su comportamiento que no había emergencia o tipo de cliente que lo hiciera hacer una excepción o salirse del librito.

La estandarización busca la robotización del ser humano. Pretende evitar que los empleados tengan criterio propio, que piensen.

Jack Stack, CEO Springfield Remanufacturing, coincidía con Henry Ford en que hay puestos para los que sólo se contratan manos, sin embargo para él el cerebro viene gratis. Las empresas más exitosas son aquellas que confían en su gente, la desarrollan y aprovechan su talento.

En un mundo de competidores ágiles es insuficiente una visión de control que busque prioritariamente mantener comportamientos acotados y resultados predecibles. Debemos rechazar el instinto de buscar certidumbre a través del control. Ante el cambio se requiere adaptación, para adaptarnos requerimos flexibilidad y esta necesita aprendizaje.

El control perfecto, entendido como la completa certeza de que los resultados serán como los planeamos, no existe. Lo nuevo lo debemos enfrentar con inteligencia y una organización debería diseñar estructuras que lo permitan y fomenten.

BY ANTONIO C.

El beneficio más importante de trabajar en equipo es el incremento de la productividad dentro de una organización. Y, precisamente, para lograr un trabajo en equipo cohesionado y eficaz, primeramente, el líder tiene que tener la condición y la claridad de que con ello obtendrá mayor productividad.

Muchos líderes en diferentes organizaciones tienen paradigmas como “divide y vencerás”; es decir, prefieren que la comunicación entre ellos sea limitada, para asegurar un control total sobre la individualidad de cada uno de sus colaboradores, pero eso provoca que entre ellos se genere mucha separación. Hay que recordar que la frase “divide y vencerás” es un paradigma que se utilizaba en la guerra para dividir al enemigo, no para dividir al amigo; Es decir, es un paradigma muy potente si estás en la guerra, pero si estás dirigiendo a un equipo de trabajo tienes que entender que la suma de las partes te asegura un mejor resultado en cuanto a lo que quieres lograr. Independientemente del estilo de liderazgo que tenga el gerente en cuestión, debe tener en la mente el sentido de la abundancia, del beneficio mutuo, del Ganar-Ganar, en la relación de trabajo con sus compañeros.

 ¿Qué debe hacer un líder para lograrlo? Pasos a seguir
  • Influir en su equipo, justamente, en esa filosofía; se trata de algo mental en un inicio. Influir en el equipo en que la suma de las partes es mayor que el todo.
  • Provocar que la gente aprenda a diagnosticar a las personas con las que trabaja, de tal forma que cada uno de los miembros de un equipo sepa con claridad qué es lo que el otro necesita. Cualquier herramienta que el líder utilice para fomentar la comunicación de ida y vuelta resulta vital.
  • Aprender a manejar adecuadamente los conflictos, ya que cuando tú te das permiso para conocer o entender a otra persona, te das cuenta de que tal vez ésta no necesita lo que tú quieres y eso genera conflicto. Es decir, la diferencia por definición genera malestar y la única manera de resolverlo es teniendo una técnica de manejo de conflictos para lograr equipos sinérgicos.

Asimismo, herramientas como la retroalimentación y el reconocimiento son excelentes accesorios para fomentar el trabajo en equipo. Uno de los valores organizaciones en aras de fomentarlo es retroalimentar a la gente, así como reconocer a las personas que sobresalen en este trabajo colaborativo, lo cual genera entornos de admiración por aquellos que lo hacen bien y un estímulo para aquellos que no lo están haciendo, empiecen a ejecutarlo.

Las actividades de integración también son eficaces para lograr este objetivo; y no todas necesariamente en el plano laboral.

Disciplina progresiva; Administración del desempeño del equipo

Cuando existe conflicto entre los miembros de un equipo de trabajo, la organización debe implantar alguna herramienta que le permita administrar el desempeño de su gente, lo que se conoce como disciplina progresiva. Se trata de estrategias y procesos que ayudan, precisamente, a aquellas personas que están distantes del objetivo, para que lo vayan logrando, y modifiquen poco a poco sus paradigmas, sus comportamientos y sus emociones, en todo lo que implica la colaboración.

By Raciel S.

Como Consultor de liderazgo, nunca pierdo una oportunidad de preguntarle a ejecutivos de alto nivel qué es lo que ellos consideran crítico para que las personas y organizaciones tengan éxito en el dinámico entorno empresarial de la actualidad. Recientemente me reuní con la vicepresidente ejecutiva de una compañía de la lista Fortune 500 que ha construido muchos equipos nacionales y globales, y que sirve como una líder altamente inspiracional para su organización e industria. Ella me dijo que ser creativo e innovador son los dos factores más importantes para el éxito -no sólo para las compañías, sino para los líderes y sus equipos. La investigación ha validado estos hallazgos.

¿Cómo pueden los líderes liberar el rango completo de pensamiento en sus equipos? He aquí algunas estrategias:

— EVITE QUEDAR ACORRALADO POR EL PROCESO: Si un equipo está bloqueado creativamente, un primer paso es que el líder examine si es que los procesos están afectando el razonamiento. El seguir sistemáticamente las reglas puede apagar las lluvias de ideas, pues algunos podrían dudar de expresar puntos de vista alternativos. Si este es el caso, trate de remover algunas estructuras procedimentales durante las sesiones creativas.
— FACILITE EL ARROJAR ESPAGUETI: La investigación muestra que 80% de las personas consideran que liberar el potencial creativo es clave para el crecimiento económico, pero solo el 25% sienten que están aplicando plenamente su potencial creativo. Trabaje en crear un entorno de seguridad psicológica. Aliente el conflicto y debate saludable y, en lugar de micro-gerenciar, dele a otros las riendas para explorar y asumir riesgos.
— REVELE LOS “PISOS PEGAJOSOS”: Todos poseen las bases para volverse creativos, lo que inicia cuando los miembros del equipo creen en sí mismos como generadores de ideas. Cuando alguien del equipo siente que no es inherentemente innovador, esa creencia puede convertirse rápidamente en lo que llamo un “piso pegajoso”: una suposición auto limitante que puede sabotear el éxito. Parte del rol de un líder consiste en usar la inteligencia emocional para determinar si hay integrantes del equipo que inconscientemente se están reprimiendo. Ayúdelos a ser conscientes del piso pegajoso, y bríndeles entrenamiento y apoyo para expresar ideas innovadoras en el entorno del equipo.
— ALIENTE UNA MENTALIDAD DE CRECIMIENTO – ADEREZADA CON ATENCIÓN PLENA: La mentalidad de crecimiento, un término acuñado por la Dra. Carol Dweck, se refiere a cómo la persona piensa acerca de sus propias habilidades. Las personas con una mentalidad de crecimiento creen que pueden mejorar a través de su propio esfuerzo. Aceptan los contratiempos y no los ven como fracasos. Los líderes deberían instruir a sus empleados para abrazar esta mentalidad, explicándoles cómo la creencia interna de que pueden volverse más creativos los ayuda a desarrollar esas habilidades a lo largo del tiempo, aprendiendo de sus errores y mejorando. Una práctica de atención plena también puede ayudar a amplificar los resultados, pues las investigaciones revelan que la meditación despierta los impulsos creativos. Incrementar la atención plena puede ser tan simple como caminar a mitad del día mientras se enfoca en lo que le rodea, o alejar las distracciones tecnológicas en momentos específicos, para inspirar el pensamiento libre.

La meta de hacer que su equipo piense más allá de la caja es evidente, pero descubrir cómo realmente lograr una mayor innovación grupal no es tan sencillo. Enfóquese para lograrlo del mismo modo en que enfrentaría cualquier otro desafío gerencial: creativamente.

La tecnología augura un cambio disruptivo en los procesos de contratación de los empleados y en la forma de trabajar de las empresas, pero aún prima el factor humano en los equipos de gestión de personal y departamentos de recursos humanos.
Las compañías y, en concreto los equipos de recursos humanos, que buscaran la forma más humana de gestionar a los trabajadores, la manera más eficiente de trabajar y la mayor ventaja competitiva para la empresa.
Digitalización de los procesos mecánicos

Es el turno de que los departamentos de recursos humanos abracen la transformación digital. Las grandes, medianas y pequeñas empresas van a prescindir de los procesos manuales que tanto tiempo quitan a los empleados en sus jornadas. El registro de gastos y facturas, por ejemplo, será cada vez más automático a través de fotografías y aplicaciones móviles que desterrarán el montón de papeles y el picado de datos. Este tipo de procesos permitirán ganar tiempo, evitar pérdidas y dedicar más energía y recursos a tareas de más valor.
Democratización de la tecnología

La evolución de la tecnología y la facilidad para acceder a ella va a permitir a las pymes tener acceso a muchas herramientas que antes les era más difícil. También la gestión del personal y las opciones de flexibilidad y motivación de los empleados se universalizan: independientemente del sector y el tamaño de las compañías, se comienzan a automatizar procesos, flexibilizar horarios, ofrecer otras formas retributivas… todas las empresas van a poder beneficiarse de las innovaciones en el campo de los recursos humanos y tener la posibilidad de acceder a herramientas económicas y sencillas de utilizar.

Mejorar el efecto blurring (efecto difuso)
Una de las cosas de las que se quejan es la conciliación de la vida personal y la laboral. Hay ciertos hábitos asociados al ocio que se pueden instaurar en la rutina laboral y que mejoran la productividad y la motivación de los empleados. Por ejemplo, el disfrute de pedir comida en la pausa del medio día es cada vez más habitual en las oficinas, una práctica que era común mayoritariamente en los momentos de ocio. Las empresas van a introducir pequeños incentivos para adoptar estos hábitos, motivar a los empleados y ayudarles a optimizar sus tiempos.

Universalización del salario flexible
Al igual que la innovación tecnológica está llegando a todas las compañías, independientemente de su tamaño y sector, las opciones de flexibilización de salario se han extendido prácticamente por casi todas las empresas.

En este contexto, serán cada vez más las compañías que ofrezcan a sus trabajadores la posibilidad de decidir sus formas de retribución (elegir una única cuantía bruta u opciones de Ticket Restaurant, transporte, seguros médicos, bonos guardería…), con procesos mucho más automáticos y sencillos, pues es ya una clara preferencia para los empleados y, por tanto, una ventaja competitiva para las empresas a la hora de encontrar y retener talento.

Programas de bienestar en la empresa
Las compañías y sus directivos están asumiendo parte de la responsabilidad del bienestar de su equipo, y se va a apostar por programas y acciones para mejorar los hábitos de los empleados, si no las relaciones interpersonales y el ambiente en la oficina. Ya que con esto se consigue un equipo mas incentivado y productivo.

Los departamentos de recursos humanos tienen que seguir el ritmo a la digitalización y a los nuevos estilos de vida de las personas, y muchas empresas comenzarán a hacerlo ahora, cuando ya tantos departamentos están implementando cambios, para terminar de crear una organización integral. Las entidades serán realmente competitivas cuando consigan optimizar la gestión del personal y ofrecer a su capital humano una mejora en sus condiciones para poder desempeñar su trabajo.

La sociedad se encuentra en un proceso de cambio constante en un mundo cada vez más globalizado y competitivo.

Con este cambio constante, las organizaciones requieren profesionales cada vez más creativos que logren convertir sus ideas en riqueza para la sociedad (productos y servicios innovadores). Por este motivo se da un importante incremento del interés en diferentes organizaciones por el fomento del emprendimiento, por la creación de departamentos de investigación, innovación y desarrollo, que no sólo fortalezcan la creación de nuevas unidades de negocios, sino también el desarrollo de competencias emprendedoras que permitan ser, a los futuros profesionales y personas con compromiso social, responsables con la transformación positiva de los entornos o comunidades donde habitan.

Por esta razón, hoy cada vez más empresas se preocupan por desarrollar en sus empleados la competencia de creatividad e innovación, entendida en el campo de la psicología de las organizaciones como la “capacidad de realizar una búsqueda sistemática de oportunidades y soluciones de problemas a través de maneras diferentes de pensar y de actuar, que suelen materializarse en productos y servicios nuevos que satisfacen las necesidades de un público objetivo”.

Según el periodista y escritor, tres veces ganador del premio Pulitzer, Friedman Thomas:
“Adaptarse en un mundo plano, saber cómo aprender a aprender, será una de las bases más importantes del trabajador, porque la redistribución laboral se hará más deprisa, porque las innovaciones surgirán más rápidamente” [y cuanto más] “se amplían los horizontes del conocimiento y de la tecnología, cuanto más compleja son las tareas que pueden realizar las máquinas, mayor será la demanda de personas que tengan una forma especializada o la capacidad de aprender a aprender, y mejores sueldos se les ofrecerá” (Thomas, F., 2006, p. 254, 255).

Teniendo en cuenta esta realidad, es necesario señalar que la competitividad para una organización se logra, entre otras cosas, poniendo especial atención en el conocimiento que día a día se va generando, tanto por las personas, como por la interacción entre estas, ya que es desde el aprendizaje y desde la gestión del conocimiento donde se empieza a construir una plataforma para tener ventajas competitivas y de diferenciación.

¿Cómo es la estructura de una organización innovadora?

Es por lo anterior que la organización innovadora, por lo tanto, suele basarse en equipos multidisciplinares, donde los departamentos clásicos funcionales se diluyan y pierdan cada vez más poder, en beneficio de la misión global de la empresa y, en todo caso, se conviertan en centros de formación y de provisión de recursos para los diferentes proyectos de innovación.

La creatividad es la otra cara de la innovación. En otras palabras, la creatividad es la capacidad de producir ideas nuevas y únicas y la innovación es la puesta en marcha de esa creatividad, es la introducción de una nueva idea, solución, proceso o producto. La creatividad es la fuerza motriz de la innovación y supone una mirada fresca y renovada de las cosas desde una perspectiva diferente y sin restricciones.
La innovación es un medio privilegiado para alcanzar los objetivos estratégicos, mejorar la competitividad, marcar la diferencia y crear valor.

¿Qué podemos hacer para desarrollar la creatividad e innovación?
1.Fórmate. Desde Estrategia Consulting Group y MIGUEL PLA CONSULTORES impulsamos el desarrollo de estas competencias como lo son: Desarrollar el potencial creativo, Innovar en el modelo de negocio con el Método Canvas e Innovación en la práctica.
2.Coge vacaciones. La rutina es el enemigo de la creatividad. En ocasiones conviene tomarse un tiempo para ausentarse del trabajo. Por lo general viene con varios beneficios para la salud, que incluyen una presión arterial más baja y mejores niveles emocionales. Después de un merecido descanso, tu cuerpo regresará más inspirado y listo para crear.
3. Asistir a conferencias. Las conferencias de la industria son un gran recurso para la inspiración. Es un lugar donde puedes conocer a otros profesionales con ideas afines, escuchar conversaciones interesantes de otros líderes y establecer contactos con otras empresas.
________________________________________
By : Andrea Miras Ramos

¿Qué es liderazgo? Cada uno de nosotros creemos tener una idea sobre lo que significa ser un buen líder, pero a la hora de definir el concepto, la cosa no está tan clara. Para algunos el liderazgo es motivación, para otros es sinónimo de resultados, para otros, inspiración.

Sea como sea, podemos definir el liderazgo basándonos en unos elementos comunes con los que todos coincidimos. Estas son las 10 maneras de definir el arte de liderar:

1. Visión
Liderar implica tener una visión y compartirla con los demás. Sólo cuando se consigue inspirar a los demás, se logra compartir una meta común hacia la que dirigir los esfuerzos y dedicación de todo el equipo. ¿Cuál es tu visión?

2. Motivación
El líder sabe motivar como nadie, es una de sus principales funciones como gestor de personas. A través de la motivación, el líder canaliza la energía y el potencial profesional de sus compañeros, con el fin de conseguir los objetivos.

3. Servir
El líder está al servicio del equipo, y no al revés. Los miembros del grupo deben contar y sentir el apoyo de su líder, tener al alcance las herramientas necesarias para desempeñar su trabajo de forma adecuada, ver reconocidos sus esfuerzos y saber que hay una persona atenta para corregir los malos hábitos. Todo eso forma parte de un liderazgo que sirve a su equipo, y no al revés.

4. Empatía
Una de las cualidades de un líder que se preste al éxito es precisamente la inteligencia emocional, esa capacidad -a menudo innata- que tienen los líderes para ponerse en el lugar de los demás, comprender sus preocupaciones y dar solución a los problemas. Los líderes conocen los secretos de su negocio y por eso pueden mostrar empatía con los clientes y con los miembros de su equipo: esa empatía consigue inspirar y establecer lazos que conducen al éxito.

5. Creatividad
La definición de liderazgo también tiene que ver con la creatividad. Los buenos líderes son capaces de crear un entorno que anime a todos los miembros de su equipo a desarrollar sus habilidades y su imaginación, de manera que contribuyan con su sello personal al proyecto cómun y la visión de la empresa. Si quieres liderar con éxito, respeta la creatividad de los demás y aprende de la gente que te rodea, seguro que sus ideas suman en lugar de restar.

6. Exigencia
Un buen líder pone el listón muy alto a los suyos, porque quiere lograr los objetivos y sacar lo mejor de su equipo. Solamente un líder exigente logrará grandes resultados. Además de esa exigencia, el líder tiene que saber escuchar, para conocer las necesidades de sus compañeros y poder después ofrecerles el tiempo y los recursos necesarios para que hagan bien su trabajo y, por tanto, cumplan con lo que se les exige.

7. Dirigir
El líder debe estar al frente para dirigir y servir de guía a su equipo durante todo el proceso hasta que se cumple el objetivo marcado. Pero además de esa “avanzadilla”, los líderes también saben cuándo dar un paso atrás para que sea su equipo quien tome la iniciativa, de esta forma logra brindar a su equipo la oportunidad de desarrollarse personal y profesionalmente. La gestión pura se centra en las tareas, el liderazgo auténtico, en las personas.

8. Hacer equipo
El verdadero liderazgo busca trabajar en equipo para alcanzar un objetivo común. La gestión de personas es una de las tareas más difíciles a las que se enfrentan los líderes. Gracias a la actitud positiva imprescindible en los buenos líderes, y a la confianza que éstos depositan en sus compañeros, las personas obtienen mejores resultados. Los líderes con conciencia de equipo saben asumir la responsabilidad cuando algo no va bien, y recompensar al grupo tras un trabajo bien hecho.

9. Asumir riesgos
El líder es el encargado de asumir riesgos que los demás no están dispuestos a asumir. Es quien tiene la confianza suficiente para tomar una decisión, y si se equivoca, el líder debe tener el coraje suficiente para rectificar, asumir su culpa y tomar el camino correcto, sin culpabilizar al equipo. Los buenos líderes saben adelantarse a su tiempo, ven oportunidades donde otros no las ven y saben contagiar la ilusión por su visión para tratar de hacerla realidad.

10. Mejorar
El verdadero liderazgo busca la mejora continua. Los líderes tienen la capacidad de convertir a los individuos de su equipo en estrellas, personas que han mejorado sus capacidades y han logrado desarrollar habilidades gracias a la influencia de su líder.
En resumen, la definición de liderazgo no tiene que ver con la jerarquía ni la posicion de nadie en la empresa, no tiene que ver con imponer opiniones sino con escuchar a los que saben. El liderazgo es la actitud que asumen aquellas personas que buscan algo diferente, que están comprometidas a lograr un objetivo y cuya convicción logran transmitir a los demás a través de la ilusión y el optimismo, para lograr un objetivo común.
Y para ti, ¿qué es liderazgo?

How do I find innovative people for my organization? And how can I become more innovative myself?” These are questions that stump senior executives, who understand that the ability to innovate is the “secret sauce” of business success. Unfortunately, most of us know very little about what makes one person more creative than another. Perhaps for this reason, we stand in awe of visionary entrepreneurs like Apple’s Steve Jobs, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, eBay’s Pierre Omidyar, and P&G’s A.G. Lafley. How do these people come up with groundbreaking new ideas? If it were possible to discover the inner workings of the masters’ minds, what could the rest of us learn about how innovation really happens? In searching for answers, we undertook a six-year study to uncover the origins of creative—and often disruptive—business strategies in particularly innovative companies. Our goal was to put innovative entrepreneurs under the microscope, examining when and how they came up with the ideas on which their businesses were built. We especially wanted to examine how they differ from other executives and entrepreneurs: Someone who buys a McDonald’s franchise may be an entrepreneur, but building an Amazon requires different skills altogether. We studied the habits of 25 innovative entrepreneurs and surveyed more than 3,000 executives and 500 individuals who had started innovative companies or invented new products. We were intrigued to learn that at most companies, top executives do not feel personally responsible for coming up with strategic innovations. Rather, they feel responsible for facilitating the innovation process. In stark contrast, senior executives of the most innovative companies—a mere 15% in our study—don’t delegate creative work. They do it themselves. But how do they do it? Our research led us to identify five “discovery skills” that distinguish the most creative executives: associating, questioning, observing, experimenting, and networking. We found that innovative entrepreneurs (who are also CEOs) spend 50% more time on these discovery activities than do CEOs with no track record for innovation. Together, these skills make up what we call the innovator’s DNA. And the good news is, if you’re not born with it, you can cultivate it. What Makes Innovators Different? Innovative entrepreneurs have something called creative intelligence, which enables discovery yet differs from other types of intelligence (as suggested by Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences). It is more than the cognitive skill of being right-brained. Innovators engage both sides of the brain as they leverage the five discovery skills to create new ideas. In thinking about how these skills work together, we’ve found it useful to apply the metaphor of DNA. Associating is like the backbone structure of DNA’s double helix; four patterns of action (questioning, observing, experimenting, and networking) wind around this backbone, helping to cultivate new insights. And just as each person’s physical DNA is unique, each individual we studied had a unique innovator’s DNA for generating breakthrough business ideas. Imagine that you have an identical twin, endowed with the same brains and natural talents that you have. You’re both given one week to come up with a creative new business-venture idea. During that week, you come up with ideas alone in your room. In contrast, your twin (1) talks with 10 people—including an engineer, a musician, a stay-at-home dad, and a designer—about the venture, (2) visits three innovative start-ups to observe what they do, (3) samples five “new to the market” products, (4) shows a prototype he’s built to five people, and (5) asks the questions “What if I tried this?” and “Why do you do that?” at least 10 times each day during these networking, observing, and experimenting activities. Who do you bet will come up with the more innovative (and doable) idea? Studies of identical twins separated at birth indicate that our ability to think creatively comes one-third from genetics; but two-thirds of the innovation skill set comes through learning—first understanding a given skill, then practicing it, experimenting, and ultimately gaining confidence in one’s capacity to create. Innovative entrepreneurs in our study acquired and honed their innovation skills precisely this way. Let’s look at the skills in detail. Discovery Skill 1: Associating Associating, or the ability to successfully connect seemingly unrelated questions, problems, or ideas from different fields, is central to the innovator’s DNA. Entrepreneur Frans Johansson described this phenomenon as the “Medici effect,” referring to the creative explosion in Florence when the Medici family brought together people from a wide range of disciplines—sculptors, scientists, poets, philosophers, painters, and architects. As these individuals connected, new ideas blossomed at the intersections of their respective fields, thereby spawning the Renaissance, one of the most inventive eras in history. To grasp how associating works, it is important to understand how the brain operates. The brain doesn’t store information like a dictionary, where you can find the word “theater” under the letter “T.” Instead, it associates the word “theater” with any number of experiences from our lives. Some of these are logical (“West End” or “intermission”), while others may be less obvious (perhaps “anxiety,” from a botched performance in high school). The more diverse our experience and knowledge, the more connections the brain can make. Fresh inputs trigger new associations; for some, these lead to novel ideas. As Steve Jobs has frequently observed, “Creativity is connecting things.” The world’s most innovative companies prosper by capitalizing on the divergent associations of their founders, executives, and employees. For example, Pierre Omidyar launched eBay in 1996 after linking three unconnected dots: (1) a fascination with creating more-efficient markets, after having been shut out from a hot internet company’s IPO in the mid-1990s; (2) his fiancée’s desire to locate hard-to-find collectible Pez dispensers; and (3) the ineffectiveness of local classified ads in locating such items. Likewise, Steve Jobs is able to generate idea after idea because he has spent a lifetime exploring new and unrelated things—the art of calligraphy, meditation practices in an Indian ashram, the fine details of a Mercedes-Benz. Associating is like a mental muscle that can grow stronger by using the other discovery skills. As innovators engage in those behaviors, they build their ability to generate ideas that can be recombined in new ways. The more frequently people in our study attempted to understand, categorize, and store new knowledge, the more easily their brains could naturally and consistently make, store, and recombine associations. Discovery Skill 2: Questioning More than 50 years ago, Peter Drucker described the power of provocative questions. “The important and difficult job is never to find the right answers, it is to find the right question,” he wrote. Innovators constantly ask questions that challenge common wisdom or, as Tata Group chairman Ratan Tata puts it, “question the unquestionable.” Meg Whitman, former CEO of eBay, has worked directly with a number of innovative entrepreneurs, including the founders of eBay, PayPal, and Skype. “They get a kick out of screwing up the status quo,” she told us. “They can’t bear it. So they spend a tremendous amount of time thinking about how to change the world. And as they brainstorm, they like to ask: ‘If we did this, what would happen?’” Most of the innovative entrepreneurs we interviewed could remember the specific questions they were asking at the time they had the inspiration for a new venture. Michael Dell, for instance, told us that his idea for founding Dell Computer sprang from his asking why a computer cost five times as much as the sum of its parts. “I would take computers apart…and would observe that $600 worth of parts were sold for $3,000.” In chewing over the question, he hit on his revolutionary business model. Sample of Innovative Entrepreneurs from our Study Read More To question effectively, innovative entrepreneurs do the following: Ask “Why?” and “Why not?” and “What if?” Most managers focus on understanding how to make existing processes—the status quo—work a little better (“How can we improve widget sales in Taiwan?”). Innovative entrepreneurs, on the other hand, are much more likely to challenge assumptions (“If we cut the size or weight of the widget in half, how would that change the value proposition it offers?”). Marc Benioff, the founder of the online sales software provider Salesforce.com, was full of questions after witnessing the emergence of Amazon and eBay, two companies built on services delivered via the internet. “Why are we still loading and upgrading software the way we’ve been doing all this time when we can now do it over the internet?” he wondered. This fundamental question was the genesis of Salesforce.com. Imagine opposites. In his book The Opposable Mind, Roger Martin writes that innovative thinkers have “the capacity to hold two diametrically opposing ideas in their heads.” He explains, “Without panicking or simply settling for one alternative or the other, they’re able to produce a synthesis that is superior to either opposing idea.” Innovative entrepreneurs like to play devil’s advocate. “My learning process has always been about disagreeing with what I’m being told and taking the opposite position, and pushing others to really justify themselves,” Pierre Omidyar told us. “I remember it was very frustrating for the other kids when I would do this.” Asking oneself, or others, to imagine a completely different alternative can lead to truly original insights. Embrace constraints. Most of us impose constraints on our thinking only when forced to deal with real-world limitations, such as resource allocations or technology restrictions. Ironically, great questions actively impose constraints on our thinking and serve as a catalyst for out-of-the-box insights. (In fact, one of Google’s nine innovation principles is “Creativity loves constraint.”) To initiate a creative discussion about growth opportunities, one innovative executive in our study asked this question: “What if we were legally prohibited from selling to our current customers? How would we make money next year?” This led to an insightful exploration of ways the company could find and serve new customers. Another innovative CEO prods his managers to examine sunk-cost constraints by asking, “What if you had not already hired this person, installed this equipment, implemented this process, bought this business, or pursued this strategy? Would you do the same thing you are doing today?” Discovery Skill 3: Observing Discovery-driven executives produce uncommon business ideas by scrutinizing common phenomena, particularly the behavior of potential customers. In observing others, they act like anthropologists and social scientists. Intuit founder Scott Cook hit on the idea for Quicken financial software after two key observations. First he watched his wife’s frustration as she struggled to keep track of their finances. “Often the surprises that lead to new business ideas come from watching other people work and live their normal lives,” Cook explained. “You see something and ask, ‘Why do they do that? That doesn’t make sense.’” Then a buddy got him a sneak peek at the Apple Lisa before it launched. Immediately after leaving Apple headquarters, Cook drove to the nearest restaurant to write down everything he had noticed about the Lisa. His observations prompted insights such as building the graphical user interface to look just like its real-world counterpart (a checkbook, for example), making it easy for people to use it. So Cook set about solving his wife’s problem and grabbed 50% of the market for financial software in the first year. Innovators carefully, intentionally, and consistently look out for small behavioral details—in the activities of customers, suppliers, and other companies—in order to gain insights about new ways of doing things. Ratan Tata got the inspiration that led to the world’s cheapest car by observing the plight of a family of four packed onto a single motorized scooter. After years of product development, Tata Group launched in 2009 the $2,500 Nano using a modular production method that may disrupt the entire automobile distribution system in India. Observers try all sorts of techniques to see the world in a different light. Akio Toyoda regularly practices Toyota’s philosophy of genchi genbutsu—“going to the spot and seeing for yourself.” Frequent direct observation is baked into the Toyota culture. Discovery Skill 4: Experimenting When we think of experiments, we think of scientists in white coats or of great inventors like Thomas Edison. Like scientists, innovative entrepreneurs actively try out new ideas by creating prototypes and launching pilots. (As Edison said, “I haven’t failed. I’ve simply found 10,000 ways that do not work.”) The world is their laboratory. Unlike observers, who intensely watch the world, experimenters construct interactive experiences and try to provoke unorthodox responses to see what insights emerge. The innovative entrepreneurs we interviewed all engaged in some form of active experimentation, whether it was intellectual exploration (Michael Lazaridis mulling over the theory of relativity in high school), physical tinkering (Jeff Bezos taking apart his crib as a toddler or Steve Jobs disassembling a Sony Walkman), or engagement in new surroundings (Starbucks founder Howard Shultz roaming Italy visiting coffee bars). As executives of innovative enterprises, they make experimentation central to everything they do. Bezos’s online bookstore didn’t stay where it was after its initial success; it morphed into an online discount retailer, selling a full line of products from toys to TVs to home appliances. The electronic reader Kindle is an experiment that is now transforming Amazon from an online retailer to an innovative electronics manufacturer. Bezos sees experimentation as so critical to innovation that he has institutionalized it at Amazon. “I encourage our employees to go down blind alleys and experiment,” Bezos says. “If we can get processes decentralized so that we can do a lot of experiments without it being very costly, we’ll get a lot more innovation.” How Innovators Stack Up Read More Scott Cook, too, stresses the importance of creating a culture that fosters experimentation. “Our culture opens us to allowing lots of failures while harvesting the learning,” he told us. “It’s what separates an innovation culture from a normal corporate culture.” One of the most powerful experiments innovators can engage in is living and working overseas. Our research revealed that the more countries a person has lived in, the more likely he or she is to leverage that experience to deliver innovative products, processes, or businesses. In fact, if managers try out even one international assignment before becoming CEO, their companies deliver stronger financial results than companies run by CEOs without such experience—roughly 7% higher market performance on average, according to research by Gregeren, Mason A. Carpenter, and Gerard W. Sanders. P&G’s A.G. Lafley, for example, spent time as a student studying history in France and running retail operations on U.S. military bases in Japan. He returned to Japan later to head all of P&G’s Asia operations before becoming CEO. His diverse international experience has served him well as the leader of one of the most innovative companies in the world. Discovery Skill 5: Networking Devoting time and energy to finding and testing ideas through a network of diverse individuals gives innovators a radically different perspective. Unlike most executives—who network to access resources, to sell themselves or their companies, or to boost their careers—innovative entrepreneurs go out of their way to meet people with different kinds of ideas and perspectives to extend their own knowledge domains. To this end, they make a conscious effort to visit other countries and meet people from other walks of life. They also attend idea conferences such as Technology, Entertainment, and Design (TED), Davos, and the Aspen Ideas Festival. Such conferences draw together artists, entrepreneurs, academics, politicians, adventurers, scientists, and thinkers from all over the world, who come to present their newest ideas, passions, and projects. Michael Lazaridis, the founder of Research In Motion, notes that the inspiration for the original BlackBerry occurred at a conference in 1987. A speaker was describing a wireless data system that had been designed for Coke; it allowed vending machines to send a signal when they needed refilling. “That’s when it hit me,” Lazaridis recalls. “I remembered what my teacher said in high school: ‘Don’t get too caught up with computers because the person that puts wireless technology and computers together is going to make a big difference.’” David Neeleman came up with key ideas for JetBlue—such as satellite TV at every seat and at-home reservationists—through networking at conferences and elsewhere. Kent Bowen, the founding scientist of CPS technologies (maker of an innovative ceramic composite), hung the following credo in every office of his start-up: “The insights required to solve many of our most challenging problems come from outside our industry and scientific field. We must aggressively and proudly incorporate into our work findings and advances which were not invented here.” Scientists from CPS have solved numerous complex problems by talking with people in other fields. One expert from Polaroid with in-depth knowledge of film technology knew how to make the ceramic composite stronger. Experts in sperm-freezing technology knew how to prevent ice crystal growth on cells during freezing, a technique that CPS applied to its manufacturing process with stunning success. Put a Ding in the Universe Read More Practice, Practice, Practice As innovators actively engage in the discovery skills, they become defined by them. They grow increasingly confident of their creative abilities. For A.G. Lafley, innovation is the central job of every leader, regardless of the place he or she occupies on the organizational chart. But what if you—like most executives—don’t see yourself or those on your team as particularly innovative? Though innovative thinking may be innate to some, it can also be developed and strengthened through practice. We cannot emphasize enough the importance of rehearsing over and over the behaviors described above, to the point that they become automatic. This requires putting aside time for you and your team to actively cultivate more creative ideas. The most important skill to practice is questioning. Asking “Why” and “Why not” can help turbocharge the other discovery skills. Ask questions that both impose and eliminate constraints; this will help you see a problem or opportunity from a different angle. Try spending 15 to 30 minutes each day writing down 10 new questions that challenge the status quo in your company or industry. “If I had a favorite question to ask, everyone would anticipate it,” Michael Dell told us. “Instead I like to ask things people don’t think I’m going to ask. This is a little cruel, but I kind of delight in coming up with questions that nobody has the answer to quite yet.” To sharpen your own observational skills, watch how certain customers experience a product or service in their natural environment. Spend an entire day carefully observing the “jobs” that customers are trying to get done. Try not to make judgments about what you see: Simply pretend you’re a fly on the wall, and observe as neutrally as possible. Scott Cook advises Intuit’s observers to ask, “What’s different than you expected?” Follow Richard Branson’s example and get in the habit of note taking wherever you go. Or follow Jeff Bezos’s: “I take pictures of really bad innovations,” he told us, “of which there are a number.” To strengthen experimentation, at both the individual and organizational levels, consciously approach work and life with a hypothesis-testing mind-set. Attend seminars or executive education courses on topics outside your area of expertise; take apart a product or process that interests you; read books that purport to identify emerging trends. When you travel, don’t squander the opportunity to learn about different lifestyles and local behavior. Develop new hypotheses from the knowledge you’ve acquired and test them in the search for new products or processes. Find ways to institutionalize frequent, small experiments at all levels of the organization. Openly acknowledging that learning through failure is valuable goes a long way toward building an innovative culture. Try spending 15 to 30 minutes each day writing down questions that challenge the status quo in your company. To improve your networking skills, contact the five most creative people you know and ask them to share what they do to stimulate creative thinking. You might also ask if they’d be willing to act as your creative mentors. We suggest holding regular idea lunches at which you meet a few new people from diverse functions, companies, industries, or countries. Get them to tell you about their innovative ideas and ask for feedback on yours.• • • Innovative entrepreneurship is not a genetic predisposition, it is an active endeavor. Apple’s slogan “Think Different” is inspiring but incomplete. We found that innovators must consistently act different to think different. By understanding, reinforcing, and modeling the innovator’s DNA, companies can find ways to more successfully develop the creative spark in everyone.

Articulos, Creatividad, cultura organizacional, futuro organizacional, innovación, LIDERAZGO, normas en una organización, ORGANIZACION, TRABAJO EN EQUIPO, Uncategorized

ow do I find innovative people for my organization? And how can I become more innovative myself?”

These are questions that stump senior executives, who understand that the ability to innovate is the “secret sauce” of business success. Unfortunately, most of us know very little about what makes one person more creative than another. Perhaps for this reason, we stand in awe of visionary entrepreneurs like Apple’s Steve Jobs, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, eBay’s Pierre Omidyar, and P&G’s A.G. Lafley. How do these people come up with groundbreaking new ideas? If it were possible to discover the inner workings of the masters’ minds, what could the rest of us learn about how innovation really happens?

In searching for answers, we undertook a six-year study to uncover the origins of creative—and often disruptive—business strategies in particularly innovative companies. Our goal was to put innovative entrepreneurs under the microscope, examining when and how they came up with the ideas on which their businesses were built. We especially wanted to examine how they differ from other executives and entrepreneurs: Someone who buys a McDonald’s franchise may be an entrepreneur, but building an Amazon requires different skills altogether. We studied the habits of 25 innovative entrepreneurs and surveyed more than 3,000 executives and 500 individuals who had started innovative companies or invented new products.

We were intrigued to learn that at most companies, top executives do not feel personally responsible for coming up with strategic innovations. Rather, they feel responsible for facilitating the innovation process. In stark contrast, senior executives of the most innovative companies—a mere 15% in our study—don’t delegate creative work. They do it themselves.

But how do they do it? Our research led us to identify five “discovery skills” that distinguish the most creative executives: associating, questioning, observing, experimenting, and networking. We found that innovative entrepreneurs (who are also CEOs) spend 50% more time on these discovery activities than do CEOs with no track record for innovation. Together, these skills make up what we call the innovator’s DNA. And the good news is, if you’re not born with it, you can cultivate it.

What Makes Innovators Different?

Innovative entrepreneurs have something called creative intelligence, which enables discovery yet differs from other types of intelligence (as suggested by Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences). It is more than the cognitive skill of being right-brained. Innovators engage both sides of the brain as they leverage the five discovery skills to create new ideas.

In thinking about how these skills work together, we’ve found it useful to apply the metaphor of DNA. Associating is like the backbone structure of DNA’s double helix; four patterns of action (questioning, observing, experimenting, and networking) wind around this backbone, helping to cultivate new insights. And just as each person’s physical DNA is unique, each individual we studied had a unique innovator’s DNA for generating breakthrough business ideas.

Imagine that you have an identical twin, endowed with the same brains and natural talents that you have. You’re both given one week to come up with a creative new business-venture idea. During that week, you come up with ideas alone in your room. In contrast, your twin (1) talks with 10 people—including an engineer, a musician, a stay-at-home dad, and a designer—about the venture, (2) visits three innovative start-ups to observe what they do, (3) samples five “new to the market” products, (4) shows a prototype he’s built to five people, and (5) asks the questions “What if I tried this?” and “Why do you do that?” at least 10 times each day during these networking, observing, and experimenting activities. Who do you bet will come up with the more innovative (and doable) idea?

Studies of identical twins separated at birth indicate that our ability to think creatively comes one-third from genetics; but two-thirds of the innovation skill set comes through learning—first understanding a given skill, then practicing it, experimenting, and ultimately gaining confidence in one’s capacity to create. Innovative entrepreneurs in our study acquired and honed their innovation skills precisely this way.

Let’s look at the skills in detail.

Discovery Skill 1: Associating

Associating, or the ability to successfully connect seemingly unrelated questions, problems, or ideas from different fields, is central to the innovator’s DNA. Entrepreneur Frans Johansson described this phenomenon as the “Medici effect,” referring to the creative explosion in Florence when the Medici family brought together people from a wide range of disciplines—sculptors, scientists, poets, philosophers, painters, and architects. As these individuals connected, new ideas blossomed at the intersections of their respective fields, thereby spawning the Renaissance, one of the most inventive eras in history.

To grasp how associating works, it is important to understand how the brain operates. The brain doesn’t store information like a dictionary, where you can find the word “theater” under the letter “T.” Instead, it associates the word “theater” with any number of experiences from our lives. Some of these are logical (“West End” or “intermission”), while others may be less obvious (perhaps “anxiety,” from a botched performance in high school). The more diverse our experience and knowledge, the more connections the brain can make. Fresh inputs trigger new associations; for some, these lead to novel ideas. As Steve Jobs has frequently observed, “Creativity is connecting things.”

The world’s most innovative companies prosper by capitalizing on the divergent associations of their founders, executives, and employees. For example, Pierre Omidyar launched eBay in 1996 after linking three unconnected dots: (1) a fascination with creating more-efficient markets, after having been shut out from a hot internet company’s IPO in the mid-1990s; (2) his fiancée’s desire to locate hard-to-find collectible Pez dispensers; and (3) the ineffectiveness of local classified ads in locating such items. Likewise, Steve Jobs is able to generate idea after idea because he has spent a lifetime exploring new and unrelated things—the art of calligraphy, meditation practices in an Indian ashram, the fine details of a Mercedes-Benz.

Associating is like a mental muscle that can grow stronger by using the other discovery skills. As innovators engage in those behaviors, they build their ability to generate ideas that can be recombined in new ways. The more frequently people in our study attempted to understand, categorize, and store new knowledge, the more easily their brains could naturally and consistently make, store, and recombine associations.

Discovery Skill 2: Questioning

More than 50 years ago, Peter Drucker described the power of provocative questions. “The important and difficult job is never to find the right answers, it is to find the right question,” he wrote. Innovators constantly ask questions that challenge common wisdom or, as Tata Group chairman Ratan Tata puts it, “question the unquestionable.” Meg Whitman, former CEO of eBay, has worked directly with a number of innovative entrepreneurs, including the founders of eBay, PayPal, and Skype. “They get a kick out of screwing up the status quo,” she told us. “They can’t bear it. So they spend a tremendous amount of time thinking about how to change the world. And as they brainstorm, they like to ask: ‘If we did this, what would happen?’”

Most of the innovative entrepreneurs we interviewed could remember the specific questions they were asking at the time they had the inspiration for a new venture. Michael Dell, for instance, told us that his idea for founding Dell Computer sprang from his asking why a computer cost five times as much as the sum of its parts. “I would take computers apart…and would observe that $600 worth of parts were sold for $3,000.” In chewing over the question, he hit on his revolutionary business model.

To question effectively, innovative entrepreneurs do the following:

Ask “Why?” and “Why not?” and “What if?”

Most managers focus on understanding how to make existing processes—the status quo—work a little better (“How can we improve widget sales in Taiwan?”). Innovative entrepreneurs, on the other hand, are much more likely to challenge assumptions (“If we cut the size or weight of the widget in half, how would that change the value proposition it offers?”). Marc Benioff, the founder of the online sales software provider Salesforce.com, was full of questions after witnessing the emergence of Amazon and eBay, two companies built on services delivered via the internet. “Why are we still loading and upgrading software the way we’ve been doing all this time when we can now do it over the internet?” he wondered. This fundamental question was the genesis of Salesforce.com.

Imagine opposites.

In his book The Opposable Mind, Roger Martin writes that innovative thinkers have “the capacity to hold two diametrically opposing ideas in their heads.” He explains, “Without panicking or simply settling for one alternative or the other, they’re able to produce a synthesis that is superior to either opposing idea.”

Innovative entrepreneurs like to play devil’s advocate. “My learning process has always been about disagreeing with what I’m being told and taking the opposite position, and pushing others to really justify themselves,” Pierre Omidyar told us. “I remember it was very frustrating for the other kids when I would do this.” Asking oneself, or others, to imagine a completely different alternative can lead to truly original insights.

Embrace constraints.

Most of us impose constraints on our thinking only when forced to deal with real-world limitations, such as resource allocations or technology restrictions. Ironically, great questions actively impose constraints on our thinking and serve as a catalyst for out-of-the-box insights. (In fact, one of Google’s nine innovation principles is “Creativity loves constraint.”) To initiate a creative discussion about growth opportunities, one innovative executive in our study asked this question: “What if we were legally prohibited from selling to our current customers? How would we make money next year?” This led to an insightful exploration of ways the company could find and serve new customers. Another innovative CEO prods his managers to examine sunk-cost constraints by asking, “What if you had not already hired this person, installed this equipment, implemented this process, bought this business, or pursued this strategy? Would you do the same thing you are doing today?”

Discovery Skill 3: Observing

Discovery-driven executives produce uncommon business ideas by scrutinizing common phenomena, particularly the behavior of potential customers. In observing others, they act like anthropologists and social scientists.

Intuit founder Scott Cook hit on the idea for Quicken financial software after two key observations. First he watched his wife’s frustration as she struggled to keep track of their finances. “Often the surprises that lead to new business ideas come from watching other people work and live their normal lives,” Cook explained. “You see something and ask, ‘Why do they do that? That doesn’t make sense.’” Then a buddy got him a sneak peek at the Apple Lisa before it launched. Immediately after leaving Apple headquarters, Cook drove to the nearest restaurant to write down everything he had noticed about the Lisa. His observations prompted insights such as building the graphical user interface to look just like its real-world counterpart (a checkbook, for example), making it easy for people to use it. So Cook set about solving his wife’s problem and grabbed 50% of the market for financial software in the first year.

Innovators carefully, intentionally, and consistently look out for small behavioral details—in the activities of customers, suppliers, and other companies—in order to gain insights about new ways of doing things. Ratan Tata got the inspiration that led to the world’s cheapest car by observing the plight of a family of four packed onto a single motorized scooter. After years of product development, Tata Group launched in 2009 the $2,500 Nano using a modular production method that may disrupt the entire automobile distribution system in India. Observers try all sorts of techniques to see the world in a different light. Akio Toyoda regularly practices Toyota’s philosophy of genchi genbutsu—“going to the spot and seeing for yourself.” Frequent direct observation is baked into the Toyota culture.

Discovery Skill 4: Experimenting

When we think of experiments, we think of scientists in white coats or of great inventors like Thomas Edison. Like scientists, innovative entrepreneurs actively try out new ideas by creating prototypes and launching pilots. (As Edison said, “I haven’t failed. I’ve simply found 10,000 ways that do not work.”) The world is their laboratory. Unlike observers, who intensely watch the world, experimenters construct interactive experiences and try to provoke unorthodox responses to see what insights emerge.

The innovative entrepreneurs we interviewed all engaged in some form of active experimentation, whether it was intellectual exploration (Michael Lazaridis mulling over the theory of relativity in high school), physical tinkering (Jeff Bezos taking apart his crib as a toddler or Steve Jobs disassembling a Sony Walkman), or engagement in new surroundings (Starbucks founder Howard Shultz roaming Italy visiting coffee bars). As executives of innovative enterprises, they make experimentation central to everything they do. Bezos’s online bookstore didn’t stay where it was after its initial success; it morphed into an online discount retailer, selling a full line of products from toys to TVs to home appliances. The electronic reader Kindle is an experiment that is now transforming Amazon from an online retailer to an innovative electronics manufacturer. Bezos sees experimentation as so critical to innovation that he has institutionalized it at Amazon. “I encourage our employees to go down blind alleys and experiment,” Bezos says. “If we can get processes decentralized so that we can do a lot of experiments without it being very costly, we’ll get a lot more innovation.”

Scott Cook, too, stresses the importance of creating a culture that fosters experimentation. “Our culture opens us to allowing lots of failures while harvesting the learning,” he told us. “It’s what separates an innovation culture from a normal corporate culture.”

One of the most powerful experiments innovators can engage in is living and working overseas. Our research revealed that the more countries a person has lived in, the more likely he or she is to leverage that experience to deliver innovative products, processes, or businesses. In fact, if managers try out even one international assignment before becoming CEO, their companies deliver stronger financial results than companies run by CEOs without such experience—roughly 7% higher market performance on average, according to research by Gregeren, Mason A. Carpenter, and Gerard W. Sanders. P&G’s A.G. Lafley, for example, spent time as a student studying history in France and running retail operations on U.S. military bases in Japan. He returned to Japan later to head all of P&G’s Asia operations before becoming CEO. His diverse international experience has served him well as the leader of one of the most innovative companies in the world.

Discovery Skill 5: Networking

Devoting time and energy to finding and testing ideas through a network of diverse individuals gives innovators a radically different perspective. Unlike most executives—who network to access resources, to sell themselves or their companies, or to boost their careers—innovative entrepreneurs go out of their way to meet people with different kinds of ideas and perspectives to extend their own knowledge domains. To this end, they make a conscious effort to visit other countries and meet people from other walks of life.

They also attend idea conferences such as Technology, Entertainment, and Design (TED), Davos, and the Aspen Ideas Festival. Such conferences draw together artists, entrepreneurs, academics, politicians, adventurers, scientists, and thinkers from all over the world, who come to present their newest ideas, passions, and projects. Michael Lazaridis, the founder of Research In Motion, notes that the inspiration for the original BlackBerry occurred at a conference in 1987. A speaker was describing a wireless data system that had been designed for Coke; it allowed vending machines to send a signal when they needed refilling. “That’s when it hit me,” Lazaridis recalls. “I remembered what my teacher said in high school: ‘Don’t get too caught up with computers because the person that puts wireless technology and computers together is going to make a big difference.’” David Neeleman came up with key ideas for JetBlue—such as satellite TV at every seat and at-home reservationists—through networking at conferences and elsewhere.

Kent Bowen, the founding scientist of CPS technologies (maker of an innovative ceramic composite), hung the following credo in every office of his start-up: “The insights required to solve many of our most challenging problems come from outside our industry and scientific field. We must aggressively and proudly incorporate into our work findings and advances which were not invented here.” Scientists from CPS have solved numerous complex problems by talking with people in other fields. One expert from Polaroid with in-depth knowledge of film technology knew how to make the ceramic composite stronger. Experts in sperm-freezing technology knew how to prevent ice crystal growth on cells during freezing, a technique that CPS applied to its manufacturing process with stunning success.

Practice, Practice, Practice

As innovators actively engage in the discovery skills, they become defined by them. They grow increasingly confident of their creative abilities. For A.G. Lafley, innovation is the central job of every leader, regardless of the place he or she occupies on the organizational chart. But what if you—like most executives—don’t see yourself or those on your team as particularly innovative?

Though innovative thinking may be innate to some, it can also be developed and strengthened through practice. We cannot emphasize enough the importance of rehearsing over and over the behaviors described above, to the point that they become automatic. This requires putting aside time for you and your team to actively cultivate more creative ideas.

The most important skill to practice is questioning. Asking “Why” and “Why not” can help turbocharge the other discovery skills. Ask questions that both impose and eliminate constraints; this will help you see a problem or opportunity from a different angle. Try spending 15 to 30 minutes each day writing down 10 new questions that challenge the status quo in your company or industry. “If I had a favorite question to ask, everyone would anticipate it,” Michael Dell told us. “Instead I like to ask things people don’t think I’m going to ask. This is a little cruel, but I kind of delight in coming up with questions that nobody has the answer to quite yet.”

To sharpen your own observational skills, watch how certain customers experience a product or service in their natural environment. Spend an entire day carefully observing the “jobs” that customers are trying to get done. Try not to make judgments about what you see: Simply pretend you’re a fly on the wall, and observe as neutrally as possible. Scott Cook advises Intuit’s observers to ask, “What’s different than you expected?” Follow Richard Branson’s example and get in the habit of note taking wherever you go. Or follow Jeff Bezos’s: “I take pictures of really bad innovations,” he told us, “of which there are a number.”

To strengthen experimentation, at both the individual and organizational levels, consciously approach work and life with a hypothesis-testing mind-set. Attend seminars or executive education courses on topics outside your area of expertise; take apart a product or process that interests you; read books that purport to identify emerging trends. When you travel, don’t squander the opportunity to learn about different lifestyles and local behavior. Develop new hypotheses from the knowledge you’ve acquired and test them in the search for new products or processes. Find ways to institutionalize frequent, small experiments at all levels of the organization. Openly acknowledging that learning through failure is valuable goes a long way toward building an innovative culture.

Try spending 15 to 30 minutes each day writing down questions that challenge the status quo in your company.

To improve your networking skills, contact the five most creative people you know and ask them to share what they do to stimulate creative thinking. You might also ask if they’d be willing to act as your creative mentors. We suggest holding regular idea lunches at which you meet a few new people from diverse functions, companies, industries, or countries. Get them to tell you about their innovative ideas and ask for feedback on yours.• • •

Innovative entrepreneurship is not a genetic predisposition, it is an active endeavor. Apple’s slogan “Think Different” is inspiring but incomplete. We found that innovators must consistently act different to think different. By understanding, reinforcing, and modeling the innovator’s DNA, companies can find ways to more successfully develop the creative spark in everyone.

A norm is any uniform attitude or action that two or more people share by virtue of their membership in a group. We experience our attitudes toward productivity as private and personal, as originating in our own thinking, experience, and motivation, and as unique to each of us. What we fail to realize is that our attitudes arise from the norms of the groups in which we hold memberships. As a result, group norms for productivity and our attitudes toward them regulate a greater part of our work effort or lack of it than we realize.

Norms are the most powerful silent catalyst in teams. They draw a line in the sand between being a member and being an outsider. Norms define a team’s culture and dictate what behaviors are acceptable and unacceptable. Norms are not necessarily written in policy manuals, but every team member has a vivid understanding of them.

To get an understanding of your own team norms, imagine that you have been assigned to orient a new team member to routine team operations. Think about your team norms and all the issues you would have to cover with an outsider who knows nothing about your team. Some examples of statements that indicate norms are:

  • “I know the policy says that, but we do it this way.”
  • “Stay away from that person (or group). You don’t want to be associated too closely with them.”
  • “It may seem unusual, but that’s the way we do it.”
  • “Policy says these reports need to be done weekly, but we probably only do them once a month. No one pays any attention to them anyway.”
  • We conduct meetings like this…”

Norms are the silent and powerful forces that direct and guide behavior. They are not good or bad, but a simple fact of life. In other words, norms are like a landscape. Sound norms are the blossoms that enhance team performance. Unsound norms are weeds that, when left unchecked, hinder team performance. Given that, teams and leaders need to understand how to create sound norms or change existing unsound norms into ones that inspire excellence in teamwork and performance.

Norms are the building blocks for a company’s culture. To illustrate how norms work to shape a culture, picture two aquariums side by side. Both aquariums look identical from the outside. They seem to have the same variety of fish, plants, water, food, etc. When you look closer, however, one aquarium has the perfect number of fish, the ideal amount of food, and the best balance of plant life, along with the right temperature and light. The aquarium has a healthy culture. The fish and plant life thrive with energy and health.

The other aquarium appears the same from the outside but its temperature is off by a couple of degrees. The plant life is a little out of balance. There are a few too many fish, and not quite enough food. The aquarium has an unhealthy culture. The fish and plant life struggle to survive.

If you take a fish from the unhealthy aquarium and put it into the healthy aquarium, the fish will begin to improve and, over time, become invigorated with new, vibrant energy and color. Conversely, if you take a fish from the healthy aquarium and put it into the unhealthy aquarium, that fish begins to adapt to the conditions of the unhealthy environment. Colors fade, it becomes sluggish and disoriented.

Now picture a row of corporate office buildings, all looking strong, powerful, and healthy from the outside. The same principle applies as with the aquarium when introducing new people into an established culture.

Group Dynamics: How Norms Form

Leaders are the captives of their cultures. Choices remain unseen because those responsible for change are surrounded by the mirrors of the very culture they have created.
– Drs. Robert R. Blake and Jane S. Mouton

Group dynamics can make or break a change effort. They are the silent drivers and primary source for change that either encourage or impede momentum. Norms develop through three basic laws of human behavior demonstrated through relationships, teams, and organizations:

  1. Convergence
  2. Cohesion
  3. Conformity

In the same way that comprehending the law of gravity helps to understand the behavior of objects, comprehending the basic laws of group dynamics helps in understanding the power of norms and their influence on behavior and performance. Moreover, there is a natural source of power in these dynamics that a skilled and knowledgeable team can harness for maximum effectiveness.

People think of values and attitudes as private, personal, and unique, but research shows that most personal attitudes arise from group norms. As a result, team attitudes determine the quality of individual work effort more than most people realize. The norms of a group are reflected in its traditions, precedents, habits, rites, rules, rituals, regulations, policies, operating procedures, customs, taboos, and past practices. These norms begin forming through a process known as convergence.

Convergence

Convergence initiates norms spontaneously by shifting individual attitudes or patterns of behavior toward a uniform group pattern that every member shares. Few social pressures are more important for understanding change than the human tendency to converge around a common idea in a group setting. For example: a team has several members, each of whom starts out a planning meeting with an opinion regarding how much productivity is “enough.” One person thinks fifteen “units” per day is adequate, another recommends only five, while other members suggest thirteen, nine, or eight, etc. As people work together and exchange ideas, the opinions expressed lead to a shift in attitudes around a more uniform norm. Research has shown that this common dilemma is almost always resolved by a common convergence to the middle position. In the illustration, the agreed-upon productivity benchmark becomes ten, or close to ten.

Cohesion

Cohesion is the phenomenon by which people in groups congregate around common interests and values. People prefer to associate with other people like them and by whom they are liked. Cohesion is one of the most significant forces for social organization. People are naturally drawn to others who share a common experience that allows them to bypass the formalities they follow with outsiders. Examples of cohesion surface in every aspect of life as people tend to gravitate toward and give preference to others who share common interests or experiences. This preference may follow the lines of race, gender, religion, politics, socioeconomic status, or education. In organization life, other dimensions apply, such as years of service, position, level of training, or common work experience.

Cohesion is the emotional attraction people feel toward one another, and as such it accelerates the development of norms. On a social basis, we call this “bonding.” When cohesion is strong, people relate to each other with a stronger sense of trust, confidence, and commitment. They embrace the norms with pride because the shared experience feels comfortable and right. Cohesion is demonstrated in comments like, “We’ll do whatever it takes to make this happen.”

Conformity

Once a norm is established, conformity is the natural force that influences group members to maintain that norm. Conformity enforces the norm by creating pressure, often subtly, to “fall in line” with the group in reinforcing the norm. Conformity happens every time a co-worker says, “I know it’s a little unusual, but we don’t use a formal agenda for these meetings,” or “You’re coming across too strong in meetings. We like to keep these meetings relaxed and spontaneous.” The message, whether given by a gesture, comment, or outright directive, is “You need to change your behavior to fit in.” The price of non-conformity is rejection.

The Impact of Norms on the Organization and Team

Only through a never-ending effort to override the automatic behavior of the past could a change in relationships even be a remote possibility.
– Dr. Robert R. Blake

Once the dynamics are understood, the key question for every organization is “Are we conforming to norms that help us or hinder us?” In the same way that individuals can become aware of individual behavior and its impact on others, teams and entire organizations can become aware of their norms and the impact on results.

Like norms themselves, the laws of convergence, cohesion, and conformity are neither good nor bad, but are dynamics that simply happen. The influence they wield can bring power to an organization that chooses to understand and lead these norms. Left alone, they can evolve into norms that may devastate a company’s fortunes because leaders are looking elsewhere (the economy, government, or competition) for causes of poor performance. Like other natural laws, group dynamics operate 24 hours a day, rain or shine, profit or loss, in every organization. Ineffective norms have a way of creeping up unnoticed like weeds in a garden, hampering an organization’s efforts to change. To avoid this, successful organizations prevent the weeds from growing by constantly challenging unsound norms and continually reinforcing sound ones.

In Good to Great, Jim Collins compares the executive culture of two steel industry companies, Bethlehem Steel and Nucor. Both companies faced devastating setbacks in the 1980s due to a recession and the competitive challenge of cheap, imported steel. Bethlehem Steel reacted with deep cuts throughout the organization, while at the same time constructing a 21-story office building to house its executive staff. At extra expense, it designed the building in the shape of a cross in order to accommodate the large number of vice presidents who needed corner offices. Other norms for executives included using the corporate jets for weekend getaways. There were also executive golf memberships, and rank even determined shower priority at these clubs. Collins says, “Bethlehem did not decline in the 1970s and 1980s primarily because of imports or technology—Bethlehem declined first and foremost because it was a culture wherein people focused their efforts on negotiating the nuances of an intricate social hierarchy, not on customers, competitors, or changes in the external world.” Unsound norms were so strong as to manage the organization instead of the organization managing its norms.

At the other side of the spectrum was Nucor, which at the same time “took extraordinary steps to keep at bay the class distinctions that eventually encroach on most organizations.” Facing the same industry conditions, executives did not receive better benefits than front-line workers. In fact, executives had fewer perks. For example, all workers (but not executives) were eligible to receive $2,000 per year per child for up to four years of post-high school education. When Nucor had a profitable year, everyone in the company benefited. When Nucor faced tough times, everyone from the top to the bottom suffered. But people from the top suffered more. In a recent recession, for example, worker pay went down 25 percent, officer pay went down 50 percent, and the CEO’s pay went down 75 percent.

Companies that never challenge unsound norms or reinforce sound norms can find themselves at a severe disadvantage when trying to compete. A simple norm like executive perks may seem minor, but it communicates a powerful message to non-executives throughout an organization that undermines commitment and a sense of personal stake.

Changing Norms

It is only when we examine the extent to which personal attitudes, thoughts, and feelings are shared with primary group members that the regulating effect of informal norms and standards become clearly visible.
– Drs. Robert R. Blake and Jane S. Mouton

A chaos of conflicting, reluctant, and confused responses develops every time a change is introduced. This chaos creates the first stage of convergence and conformity. This stage provides teams with a critical opportunity to influence change because within the confusion lies valuable potential for leadership, creativity, and standards of excellence. This is where the “how much is enough” question is being asked and tested, when norms are in their early stages. At this pivotal point, when the group is beginning to form new norms, a leader’s style can influence how the group converges.

It is essential for leaders to be aware that these three valuable sources of energy—convergence, cohesion, and conformity—exist during periods of change. Learning how to harness them productively makes the difference between developing sound or unsound norms. There is little as demotivating to people as leadership that continues to ignore obvious realities and continues with ineffective strategies because it cannot or will not face reality.

In Good to Great, Jim Collins described the following quality as being a key factor in all “Good to Great” companies:

“On the one hand, they (‘good to great’ companies) stoically accepted the brutal facts of reality. On the other hand, they maintained an unwavering faith in the endgame, and a commitment to prevail as a great company despite the brutal facts.”

Companies that succeed in staying on the cutting edge of competition all have one thing in common: they question everything and constantly challenge norms so that complacency never sets in. Unless they are challenged, norms can become outmoded, ineffective, and deeply entrenched in the culture. When this occurs, companies perpetuate unsound practices because “That’s the way we do it around here,” even when better ways are available.

Setting Soundest Norms for Team Development

Teams establish sound norms by examining the effectiveness of existing norms. Conditions required for setting sound team standards include:

Involvement: Those who will be guided by the standards participate in establishing them.

Clarity: The standards are realistic and clearly defined.

Challenge: The standards inspire and motivate team members to achieve new levels of performance. If they do not challenge people, business will simply continue as usual and the standard-setting exercise will have been in vain.

Understanding: Every team member fully understands the meaning of each standard.

Commitment: Team members resolve to perform by the standards they set for themselves.

Excellence: Team members agree on what constitutes excellent performance and adopt standards to foster such excellence.

At Grid International, we work with clients to help them maximize their human capital. Every strategy is different and every challenge unique, but the patterns of group dynamics and culture are universal and absolutely critical for gaining a performance edge. Having a clear understanding of the group dynamics of culture and how they work is essential for mobilizing both small and large groups of people. All change efforts must begin by understanding the existing culture and how to manage and maximize this invaluable resource. We give clients the power to develop cultures that constantly reinforce standards of excellence.

 

 

 

Will technology kill jobs and exacerbate inequality, or usher in a utopia of more meaningful work and healthier societies?

While it is impossible to know what tomorrow holds, research by global professional services company PwC explores four possible futures – or “worlds” – driven by the “mega trends” of technological breakthroughs, rapid urbanization, ageing populations, shifting global economic power, resource scarcity and climate change.

The Red World – innovation rules

The world becomes a perfect incubator for innovation in one PwC scenario. Digital platforms enable those with winning ideas and specialist, niche profit-makers, to flourish.

However, PwC warns, the risks are high if innovation outpaces regulation. “Today’s winning business could be tomorrow’s court case.”

Projects will develop at a fast pace and specialists will only stay with them as long as they, or the business, last. There will be few in-house human resources teams, with outsourcers or automation providing the human services needed.

Companies may see little regulation that prevents them doing what they like, while workers will enjoy fewer benefits like health insurance, pensions and long-term employment.

The Blue World – corporate is king

Corporations grow so big and influential that some become more powerful and larger than national economies.

In a frightening vision, almost worthy of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, PwC predicts: “Human effort [will be] maximized through … physical and medical enhancement techniques and technology and, along with automation, analytics and innovation, push performance in the workplace to its limits.”

While rewards for some will be high, the price will be people’s data, which will “predict performance and anticipate people risk [predict behaviour that may damage a business financially or reputationally]”.

In both the Blue and Red Worlds, people who have strong skills – and update them – will be in demand, those who do not will be discarded.

The Green World – companies care

“This is a world where corporate responsibility isn’t just a nice-to-have, but it’s a business imperative,” PwC says.

A strong social ethos places a heavy emphasis on diversity, human rights and the non-financial impacts of business on the planet and people’s lives.

Competition for talent is intense and financial rewards are still important, while incentive packages include “three weeks’ paid leave a year to work on charity and social projects”.

However, workers are expected to reflect their employers’ values at work and at home and travel is tightly controlled.

“In this world,” the writers say, “automation and technology are essential elements to protect scarce resources and minimize environmental damage … But … technology is a double-edged sword: it allows organizations to meet their ethical and environmental agenda, but at what cost to humans?”

The Yellow World – humans come first

Financial technology enables more crowd-funded capital to reach ethically “blameless” brands, while workers and companies seek greater meaning and relevance in everyday life.

Artisanal skills return, as do workers’ guilds, which protect members’ rights and train new craftspeople: “It’s a world where humanness is highly valued,” says PwC.

Non-financial rewards are given in a trade-off for less money, work is often a fluid concept and the standard 9-to-5 working week is rare, while the divisions between home and work blur.

 

However, while the automation of tasks that are dull, damaging or impossible for humans continues, the writers say: “Conflicts remain around the use of technology, as people are less likely to take the downsides of automation without a fight.

“As more people are impacted by technical advances and see their skills become obsolete, disaffection and the push-back against policies that favour the elite grow.”

Which way to the future?

All of the four possible futures in PwC’s report share the common theme of increasing use of technology to assist, augment and replace human work.

Some foresee the dominance of global corporations, others predict the growth of smaller, more individual endeavours. All, however, depend on digital technology to link talent pools and customers, and create financially beneficial relationships, whether these are between individuals and corporations, or groups of people.

“By replacing workers doing routine, methodical tasks, machines can amplify the comparative advantage of those workers with problem-solving, leadership, emotional intelligence, empathy and creativity skills,” PwC says.

“Those workers performing tasks which automation can’t yet crack become more pivotal – and this means creativity, innovation, imagination and design skills will be prioritized by employers.”

Changing lanes

Any of these futures – or a combination of them – are possible, but how we reach 2030, and who will benefit, needs careful planning and consideration.

In the film Escape from the Planet of the Apes, a scientist compares reaching the future to a driver changing lanes: “A driver in lane ‘A’ may crash while a driver in lane ‘B’ survives. It follows that a driver, by changing lanes can change his future.”

Working out which lane will lead to a less fractured world is one of the greatest challenges facing policy makers and corporate leaders today.

Have you read?

RSS
Facebook
Twitter